What's the current state of D?

[Walter Bright]

dsimcha wrote:
> This sometimes makes me wonder if D1 and D2 are going to evolve into separate but
> related languages with separate niches at some point, something like Scheme vs.
> Common Lisp or C vs. C++.  D1, with its simplicity and the availability of Tango,
> seems well suited to be a Java++ kind of language.  D2, with its extremely
> powerful metaprogramming, greater complexity and the availability of Phobos2,
> seems more like a (C++0x)++.

D1, by definition, isn't going to evolve any more than C++98 is going to 
evolve.