What's the current state of D?

[Simen Kjaeraas]

Lutger wrote:

> - these other languages go out of their way to make new releases  
> backwards
> compatible, sometimes at great costs. They almost never completely  
> succeed
> though.

And D1 makes an effort to follow the spec, and will not incorporate
breaking changes. D2 is, in many ways, a whole new language. Sure,
you could argue that D1 code should be compilable in D2, but it
would matter no more than the argument that C code should be
compilable in D1.

--
  Simen