What's the current state of D?

[Christopher Wright]

Tyro[a.c.edwards] wrote:
> On 5/9/2009 11:24 AM, grauzone wrote:
>>> beyond and I'm quite sure that I'm not the only one. For all the
>>> Naysayers out there... Keep saying nay and go the hell away. D2 is
>>> just where it is supposed to be. Let’s not end up in the same mess we
>>> did by trying to make impatient people happy and releasing D1.
>>
>> What about the people who want to use D for something actually useful?
> 
> Well, for those cases, there is D1. Which, if I may add, is extremely 
> stable.

Agreed -- I haven't had to update my D1 code due to compiler changes, 
even if it's over a year old. Only library changes force me to update 
it. The only reason I bother updating my compiler is because of bugfixes 
and Tango updates which require those bugfixes.