What's the current state of D?

[Georg Wrede]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>> Now the only think to do is wait until Mihail Zenkov answer my mail (no
>> news for now =( ).
> 
> If he doesn't, just recode the patch and submit it. There doesn't look 
> like there's much to it. My understanding from the FSF is the only 
> concern is with patches that are more than 10 lines. The single line 
> changes here and there in the gdb patch don't need to be redone.
> 
> The point of making std.demangle public domain is so that other tools 
> can freely incorporate it and support D!


OK, Leandro, so quoting to them the above post, and quoting the 
beginning of the file demangle.d ought to do the trick:

  * Placed into the Public Domain.
...
/* Authors:
  *      Walter Bright, Digital Mars, www.digitalmars.com
  *      Thomas Kuehne
  *      Frits van Bommel


---------------

Knowing what (*seriously excuse* the wording here) fascists the FSF guys 
are, they obviously assume similar behavior of any opposition. That 
explains why they appear paranoid and unreasonable in their demands of 
the copyright statements for any code even remotely considered for 
inclusion.

PS: even if the intent is benign, there's no reason for anti-benign 
action or attitudes. That's why their track record forced me to use 
harsh language, above. ((( please don't nobody get me started on this 
one )))