While we're lynching features, how bout' them omittable parens?
Nick Sabalausky
a at a.a
Mon May 18 18:53:06 PDT 2009
"Chad J" <chadjoan at __spam.is.bad__gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gut1od$l56$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Lionello Lunesu wrote:
>>
>> "Chad J" <chadjoan at __spam.is.bad__gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:gut0f2$jc0$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> Nevermind properties. Any chance we can forbid the omittable
>>> parentheses, at least in the lhs of an assignment expression?
>>>
>>
>> This is not because of the omittable parens. Even with added parens that
>> code should not compile!
>>
>
> Agreed!
I still want to get rid of omittable parens (and function-call-as-a-lhs)
anyway. They're a horrible substitute for a real property syntax.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list