"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:53:51 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> 
>> Bill Baxter:
>>> Thinking about it more, I guess you must actually be seeing it as a
>>> rule of   " '..' always does the most useful thing",
>> Such attitude/purposes have created the monkey mess named Perl :-]
> 
> I submit the D words 'static', 'auto' and 'scope' as examples of this too.

When was the last time you had trouble with "static"? Can you show a 
snippet of code that's confusing because of it?

Andrei