"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features

[grauzone]

> I dislike the fall through as much as you do.

What about fixing it?

My proposal was always to introduce a new, second syntax, which switches 
to sane semantics:

switch (x) {
    case(value) {
       //no fall through
    }
    case value2:
       //C compatibility, fall through
}

At least the colon should make the two syntaxes [proper plural?] 
unambiguous.