static this sucks, we should deprecate it
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Thu May 28 08:41:36 PDT 2009
On Thu, 28 May 2009 11:39:28 -0400, Matti Niemenmaa
<see_signature at for.real.address> wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> If we were importing compiled files (or even generated files), then the
>> compiled file could have annotated the "static this" with the
>> dependencies it has...
>> I don't want to start another long thread on this, I understand
>> Walter's "I want to use standard linkers" position.
>
> I don't think that's an argument against this; you can always compile
> both an intermediate representation for purposes such as these in
> addition to the standard object file. It's what the Haskell compiler GHC
> does, for instance.
As long as it's part of a system where you can't accidentally use stale
files, then I'd agree. The best scenario would be to import the object
file directly IMO.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list