static this sucks, we should deprecate it

[Denis Koroskin]

On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:44:42 +0400, BCS <none at anon.com> wrote:

> Hello Steven,
>
>> fails to compile due to the perceived circular dependency, even though
>> none exists.
>
> IIRC it compiles, but fails as soon as you run it.
>
>>  -Steve
>>
>
>

Which is even worse. Walter stated that "silently generating bad code" (i.e. code that doesn't work) is a top priority bug.

I wonder why this design flaw isn't fixed for so long...