static this sucks, we should deprecate it

BCS ao at pathlink.com
Thu May 28 09:32:23 PDT 2009


Reply to Denis,

> That's *exactly* the same as silently generating bad executable. You
> run it and get "Executable is corrupted" message (or something like
> this).
> 

An executable that never works and fails with a resonable error message at 
startup is *loads* better than one that either silently runs incorrectly 
(generates bad results) or erratically fails. I see a *major* difference. 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list