static this sucks, we should deprecate it
BCS
ao at pathlink.com
Thu May 28 09:32:23 PDT 2009
Reply to Denis,
> That's *exactly* the same as silently generating bad executable. You
> run it and get "Executable is corrupted" message (or something like
> this).
>
An executable that never works and fails with a resonable error message at
startup is *loads* better than one that either silently runs incorrectly
(generates bad results) or erratically fails. I see a *major* difference.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list