About switch case statements...

[bearophile]

KennyTM~:

> switch (x) {
>    case 2:
>      doSomething();
>          // At this point:
>          // Compiles fine in C.
>          // Falls through to the next (irrelevant) branch.
>          // Compile-time error in D (missing "break;" or "goto case 3;")
>    case 3:
>      doSomeTotallyDifferentThing(x, ~x);
>      break;
>    ...
> }

Nice idea. 
"goto case 3;" isn't the nicest syntax to step to the following case, but it has the advantage that it keeps working if you shuffle the cases.
So this design is acceptable, avoids introducing a third version of switch, keeps the minimal compatibility necessary for C. If other people like it, then it may be implemented in D2.
Anyone sees disadvantages?

Bye,
bearophile