static foreach is deferred

[Clay Smith]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>>> Walter and I agreed that static foreach, although present in TDPL, poses
>>> enough new problems to warrant its deferral to post-D2.
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> Is it trouble with scopes and hygenic variable naming?
> 
> Yah. I know we all think it's an interesting path to pursue, but we'd 
> rather do a good design instead of hastily planting something we'll be 
> sorry about later.
> 
> Andrei

If this is the reason, thanks for prioritizing good design over feature 
creep. : )