Short list with things to finish for D2

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Travis Boucher wrote:
> grauzone wrote:
>>
>> If I had a better proposal, I'd post it. I'm just saying that's it's a 
>> bad hack, that _although_ solves the problem, will have negative side 
>> effects for other reasons.
>>
>> Does the current proposal make things simpler at all? All you're doing 
>> is to enable the programmer to "fix" the clumsy semantics by throwing 
>> lots of CTFE onto the problem. Why not generate the operator functions 
>> with CTFE in the first place...
> 
>  From my point of view (trying different ways of implementing something 
> as simple as a vector), this makes things much simpler without 
> sacrificing functionality.
> 
> Personally, I'd love to see an unknownMethod(string method)(...) thing 
> implemented as well, but that might be asking for too much (and might 
> sacrifice performance in some cases).

Oh, that needs to be on the list! Thanks for reminding me, I added it to 
my list.

Andrei