Should the comma operator be removed in D2?

[retard]

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:38:25 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:01:10 -0500, Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Robert Jacques wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> However, I imagine tuple(a++,b++) would have some overhead, which is
>>> exactly what someone is trying to avoid by using custom for loops.
>> <snip>
>>
>> Even if tuples do have an overhead, it would be a naive compiler that
>> generates it in cases where nothing is done with it.
>>
>> Stewart.
> 
> Actually, as the current compiler knows nothing about tuples, I'd have
> to call it very naive with respect to tuple optimization. :)

It does. Try

$ strings dmd

on *nix or compiling the following code:

  template Tuple(T...) { alias T Tuple; }
  int a, b;
  Tuple!(a, b) = Tuple!(1,2);