Short list with things to finish for D2

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

grauzone wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> grauzone wrote:
>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>> 3. It was mentioned in this group that if getopt() does not work in 
>>>> SafeD, then SafeD may as well pack and go home. I agree. We need to 
>>>> make it work. Three ideas discussed with Walter:
>>>
>>> If that's such an issue, why don't you just change it and use a 
>>> struct defined by the user? structs are natural name-value pairs that 
>>> work at compile time, and they can always be returned from functions.
> 
> No reply to this one? I would have been curious.

You mean use a struct for the string-value pair? A struct cannot have a 
ref member, so it would still need to store a pointer. (But maybe I 
misunderstood the point.)

Andrei