Short list with things to finish for D2

[aarti_pl]

bearophile pisze:
> aarti_pl:
> 
>> T opInfix(string op)(T rhs) { ... }
>> T opPrefix(string op)(T rhs) { ... }
>> T opPostfix(string op)(T rhs) { ... }
> 
> So you can use opInfix to define operators like a ~~ b :-)

Exactly. But the question is if you *REALLY* need it :-) But IMHO the 
answer is up to designer.

> Now you just need a way to define operator precedence level, with an int number in 0-14 and you're done (I don't think you need to specify operator associativity if left-to-right/right-to-left) :-)
> T opInfix(string op, int prec)(T rhs) { ... }
> There programming languages that allow to specify operator precedence level too, but I think this is overkill in D.

I agree. That's too much.

> Regarding operators, in D they are named according to their purpose and not according to their look, and I think this is a good idea. But opDollar doesn't follow that, so isn't a name like opEnd better?

I think that proposed names exactly reflect the meaning. So I would say 
it is perfectly consistent with D convention.

> 
> Bye,
> bearophile