Short list with things to finish for D2
Lutger
lutger.blijdestijn at gmail.com
Sat Nov 21 09:16:08 PST 2009
Chad J wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> grauzone wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, you should fix the auto-flattening of tuples before it's too
>>> late. I think everyone agrees that auto-flattening is a bad idea, and
>>> that tuples should be nestable. Flattening can be done manually with
>>> an unary operator.
>>>
>>> (Introducing sane tuples (e.g. unify type and value tuples, sane and
>>> short syntax, and all that) can wait for later if it must. Introducing
>>> these can be downwards compatible, I hope.)
>>
>> Non-flattening should be on the list but I am very afraid the solution
>> would take a long time to design, implement, and debug. I must discuss
>> this with Walter.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Might I suggest a daring stop-gap: kill tuples altogether.
>
> Then we can implement them later correctly and it won't break backwards
> compatibility.
>
> Ideally it isn't an all-or-nothing proposition either. Maybe we can
> just kill the parts that are bad. Like disallow tuples-of-tuples, but
> allow tuples that are already flat.
>
> - Chad
By the time you would have restored phobos to about 50% of it's usefulness
you could have implemented non-flattening tuples ten times over. I would
switch back to D1 :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list