Why we need opApply (Was: Can we drop static struct initializers?)

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Walter Bright wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
>> If anyone sees any harm in keeping opApply other than a slightly 
>> larger language
>> spec, please let me know.  Despite its having been superseded by 
>> ranges for a
>> subset of use cases (and this subset, I will acknowledge, is better 
>> handled by
>> ranges), I actually think the flexibility it gives in terms of how 
>> foreach can be
>> implemented makes it one of D's best features.
> 
> Thanks for writing this. It's nice to have a compelling argument, and 
> you gave one. Looks like opApply is staying.

I think the same. Thanks, David.

Andrei