dmd support for IDEs

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Don" <nospam at nospam.com> wrote in message 
news:haumhk$1oet$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Jeremie Pelletier" <jeremiep at gmail.com> wrote in message 
>> news:hats2b$as0$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> It has pros and cons, Firefox too has the native look and feel without 
>>> using the native controls, so it saves on the overhead of tons of GDI 
>>> handles and can render the entire GUI in cairo.
>>
>> I use FF a lot and umm...no it doesn't. Not remotely. It's always stood 
>> out as every bit of a blatant GTK app as GAIM, GIMP, or Thunderbird. As 
>> soon as I can find a browser with equivilents too all my essential hacks 
>> (*cough* extensions) and *real* controls (which rules out IE and Opera. 
>> And Chrome/Safari... AH HA HA HA!), then I'm ditching this garbage.
>
> Are you talking about FF 3.5? It's a really poor product. Crashes all the 
> time, has some terrible UI misfeatures. I'm really amazed they shipped it 
> in that condition.

Never touched FF3.5, I tried FF3 and it was such a worthless POS I went back 
to FF2, which is still a total POS, or course, but at least this way I have 
separate back/forward dropdowns, winestripe actually works, and I have no 
awfulbar *without* needing an anti-awfulbar addon (mozilla's standard 
strategy: force idiotic ill-conceived changes on everyone and rely on 
third-party add-on hacks for anyone who wants it fixed).