Revamping associative arrays
Moritz Warning
moritzwarning at web.de
Sat Oct 17 12:06:36 PDT 2009
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:58:08 +0000, BCS wrote:
> Hello Chris Nicholson-Sauls,
>
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Associative arrays are today quite problematic because they don't
>>> offer any true iteration. Furthermore, the .keys and .values
>>> properties create new arrays, which is wasteful.
>>>
>>> Another issue with associative arrays is that ++a[k] is hacked, which
>>> reflects a grave language limitation. That needs to be replaced with a
>>> true facility.
>>>
>>> Any other issues with AAs that you want to see fixed, and ideas
>>> guiding a redesign?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>> Idea: the .keys and .values properties, rather than creating arrays,
>> could create iterable ranges with the smallest possible footprint,
>> internally walking the tree structure.
>>
>>
> what will this do?
>
> foreach(key; aa.keys)
> if(Test(key))
> aa.remove(key);
It's undefined behavior.
You shouldn't try to mutate the aa while iterating.
I hope that will be fixed.
It took me some time to find this out.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list