Targeting C
Pelle Månsson
pelle.mansson at gmail.com
Fri Oct 23 10:49:43 PDT 2009
bearophile wrote:
> Yigal Chripun:
>
>> Hell no. This is why I hate certain programming languages.
>> if you are trying to obfuscate the language than why not just define:
>> rtqfrdsg and fdkjtkf as the function names?
>
> Don't be silly. In my dlibs "xsomething" are the lazy functions, and "something" are the strict ones. That's not obfuscated, you need seconds to learn a single easy rule.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
I think the complaint was not as much about the x as the iota.
Seriously, iota?
However, I like the array(range(0,10)) where range is always lazy, and
array forces eagerness, better than separate xrange and range functions.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list