Nullable or Optional? Or something else?
Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 13:13:55 PDT 2009
Danny Wilson <bluezenix at gmail.com> wrote:
> Op Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:39:28 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>:
>
>> I plan to add a Nullable struct to Phobos (akin to C#'s Nullable,
>> Boost's Optional).
>>
>> Apparently a good design is to define Optional!T with a minimum of
>> member functions (ideally none) and have it use the "alias this"
>> feature to masquerade as a T. That way Optional!T looks and feels much
>> like a T, except that it supports a function
>>
>> bool isNull(T)(Optional!T value);
>>
>> Am I on the right track? If so, what is the name you'd prefer for this
>> artifact?
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
>
> How about: Maybe!T
>
>
> Got that from Haskell :-)
I also feel the bikeshed should be colored 'Maybe'.
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list