Results are in: static foreach is a slower than hand unrolling yourloops or using mixins.

[BCS]

Hello Gareth,

> I managed to get some free time to look at this and it would appear
> that static foreach is slower than hand unrolling a loop. Fortunately
> there are no detectable differences between hand unrolling a loop and
> building the body of the loop in a compile time string and using a
> mixin. Results are here:

Last time I checked, static foreach tended to load the index onto the stack 
for each iteration even if it was never used. Did you take a look at the ASM?

-- 
... <IXOYE><