Documentation generation

[Lutger]

Walter Bright wrote:

> bearophile wrote:
>> Removing that HTML ddoc parsing & HTML generation from DMD allows such code
>> to evolve faster and to be debugged more efficiently. Today some people are
>> using
> 
> There are very good reasons why ddoc is part of dmd.
> 
> 1. Being a defined part of D means it's ALWAYS there. That means there won't
> be D compilers without ddoc. That means that people can rely on it being
> there, and use it with confidence.
...

I agree, though the standard output is not so pleasant. When the new website 
design is adopted, would you please consider shipping a .ddoc plus the css 
needed in a similar style for user documentation? No doubt people are willing to 
help with this, I certainly would.