Andrei's Google Talk

[mwarning]

On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:19:02 -0400, Adam Ruppe wrote:

> On 8/4/10, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote:
>> I am sorry to say this, but I think porting the current back-end to 64
>> bit is a waste of time because it will not be used for professional
>> usages. I think LLVM will be the main back-end for professional usages
>> of D2
> 
> Get back to me when LDC starts to actually /work/. It is *completely
> unusable* in its current state and its developers don't seem to care.
> 
> I don't understand what you see in it.

LDC for llvm 2.7 doesn't have debug support because the LDC debug info 
code only works for llvm 2.6. I assume that's what you call unusable?
There are bugs as well, sure. But nothing too serious from what I know 
about.

LDC is developed on a personal by need/interest basis.
Atm. the original developers don't have time or much interest in LDC.
It's a volunteer effort from the beginning and everyone is invited to 
work on ldc.