Logical const

[Bruno Medeiros]

On 29/11/2010 14:56, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> This has been discussed at length on this newsgroup, and I argued for it
> for a long time.  You will not get any traction with Walter, because
> I've already proven that logical const == const, and it still doesn't
> change his mind.

Could you detail a bit what do you mean by logical const == const ? That 
doesn't sound right to me.

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer