tail const

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/3/10 7:26 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> BTW, even though I conceed that my ideas are too complex to be worth
> using, I don't agree we must "make-do" without tail-const. We just need
> to find a different way to solve the problem. Let's talk about how we
> could add some sort of custom implicit casting to the type-system. And
> actually, we need implicit lvalue casting (because all member functions
> have ref this).

I believe this is the level of understanding and the kind of attitude 
that can push things forward.

Andrei