Problems with D const ref vs C++ const &
Don
nospam at nospam.com
Fri Dec 10 13:58:39 PST 2010
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/10/10 12:47 PM, Craig Black wrote:
>>>
>>> auto ref should work for non-templates and generate only one function.
>>> The current implementation of auto ref originates in a misunderstanding.
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> Thanks for the response. I assume Walter is aware of this problem? What
>> are the chances that this gets fixed soon?
>
> There are various pressures on Walter's and Don's time, but generally
> the problems that cause people pain are more discussed around here and
> tend to be looked at sooner.
>
> Andrei
It didn't seem to me that there was a convincing outcome from that
discussion. We need an actual spec!
(I only fix bugs. I don't make language decisions).
In my opinion, the signature of opEquals is a litmus test for the const
system.
If it's elegant, we've struck gold.
If it isn't, we've still got work to do.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list