Destructors, const structs, and opEquals

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/11/10 2:49 CST, spir wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:28:08 -0800
> Andrei Alexandrescu<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>  wrote:
>
>> It's sort of ironic. Tu viens d'implementing yet another type
>> constructor yourself!
>
> The need for yet another one signifie sûrement (probably means) their semantics (in the human sense) are wrongly defined. D2 needs un regard neuf et lucide (a fresh external look) at its whole set of qualifiers.

I'm all for it. Even if we can't change the language, I'd like to know 
"the truth". Because if there's a simple way to go about it that has 
comparable power, we couldn't find it.

Andrei