Why Ruby?
David Nadlinger
see at klickverbot.at
Sat Dec 11 11:17:27 PST 2010
On 12/11/10 8:06 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Maybe if we have any luck with SWIG we'll be able to make some
> primitive wrappers for common C++ libraries. I'm just trying SWIG out
> these days, but some people have reported success in wrapping some
> libraries.
While I certainly appreciate the advertisement, the OMF/COFF issue
described in this thread is not fundamentally solved by SWIG. In fact,
this is precisely the reason why SWIG by default generates code to
dynamically bind the symbols from the wrapper DLL at run-time – contrary
to static linking, you don't need object file compatibility then (the
same approach is also used by other projects like Derelict and QtD).
David
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list