Why Ruby?

[foobar]

Adam D. Ruppe Wrote:

> so wrote:
> > Am i alone thinking D one better here?
> 
> No, I find foreach to be significantly better than the ruby
> blocks too. I recently argued on the gentoo forums that
> they are virtually equivalent too:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6500059.html#6500059
> 
> opApply is implemented with a delegate!

Exactly. D basically re-writes foreach with opApply into the Ruby version which is why Ruby is *BETTER*.
foreach to me is a redundant obfuscation.