Slides from my ACCU Silicon Valley talk

[Alex_Dovhal]

"Don" <nospam at nospam.com> wrote:
> Agreed. I've just looked through some code that I thought used them 
> extensively, but found only two complex literals: 1i (dozens of instances) 
> and 2i (one instance).

So if D removes complex literals what the proposed name  for Imaginary One 
would be?
_i  ,   i_  ,   _i_,  _I  ,   I  ,   M_I   ??
@i   @j   looks good to me, I'd like even having them both.

Compare code:
0.998f + 2.72e-2fi
0.998f + @i*2.72e-2f
0.998f + 2.72e-2f* @j