Purity

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:22:25 +0000, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:55:18 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:53:15 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
>> <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>> P.
>> 
>> Damn, accidentally hit shift-enter which sent the message.
>> 
>> Meant to write:
>> 
>> P.S. is there a better adjective for 'immutable or implicitly
>> convertable to immutable'?  That's a lot of verbiage for something
>> that's really needed in a lot of places in the spec.
> 
> Value type?
> 
> That is, a real value type, not one that is really a reference in
> disguise.  "Pure value type", perhaps?

Ah, forget it.  That doesn't include immutable references.

-Lars