New syntax for string mixins

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2010-12-17 00:34, Graham St Jack wrote:
>
>> I've attached a part of how concurrency.d could look like translated
>> to my suggested syntax. It probably contains a lot of errors because
>> did a quick translation and I had some trouble understanding the mixins.
>>
> Yes, even I couldn't understand them even a week later. Maintenance is a
> real problem.
>
> My initial reaction is that the proposed syntax helps a bit, but isn't
> really a game-changer. I will let you know if I change my mind on closer
> inspection.

No it's basically just syntactic sugar.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg