disabling unary "-" for unsigned types
Walter Bright
newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Tue Feb 16 03:08:55 PST 2010
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Lutger wrote:
>>> It's a valid viewpoint, but it is a 'should'. I believe many
>>> programmers have only passing familiarity if at all with the
>>> semantics of unsigned types and floating point operations. At least
>>> when coding, they don't have these semantics in mind. Why do you
>>> think Java doesn't have unsigned types?
>>
>> Naive programmers have trouble with Java floating point as well:
>>
>> http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/JAVAhurt.pdf
>>
>> There's just no getting around it. Should Java just remove floating
>> point types as well?
>>
>> Heck, I knew a degree'd mechanical engineer who could not understand
>> why his calculator kept giving him answers off by a factor of 2 (he
>> refused to understand roundoff error, no matter how many times I tried
>> to explain it to him - he believed that calculators had mathematically
>> perfect arithmetic).
>
> How could he refuse?
Beats me. Naturally, I lost all respect for his engineering prowess.
> One of my favorite games with calculators was to
> successively extract square root of 2 until I got 1. The better the
> calculator, the more steps it takes. That's kind of difficult to refuse
> to acknowledge :o).
>
> Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list