D Language 2.0

[Tuple! ()]

dennis luehring Wrote:

> Am 20.01.2010 12:42, schrieb retard:
> > Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:17:44 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >
> >>  Walter and I are very convinced that the approach based on
> >>  rewriting/lowering is very promising.
> >
> > This sounds really good. I'm sure this could be extended to other built-
> > in types as well.
> 
> i don't think its needed for other types then arrays - because of the 
> slicing

Runtime tuples come to my mind. Also complex numbers etc. But we already know that the complex number issue has been already decided. So let's concentrate on the tuple answer from Walter :)