D Language 2.0
Leandro Lucarella
llucax at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 05:16:11 PST 2010
bearophile, el 20 de enero a las 01:51 me escribiste:
> A better strategy is first of all to improve a lot the D GC
Is not a better strategy, is another strategy. Improving the GC is as
important as (or even more important than) having a -nogc option. But an
extremely efficient GC will not be suitable for all purposes (specially
for embedded systems, which is the origin of this thread). That's just
a fact, "there is no silver buller". So ignoring the need for a -nogc
option is not going to do things better.
Both things should be acknowledged, the need for a better GC and the need
for making easy to completely avoid the GC (which I agree, is less
important than the former, because most of the D code will use the GC).
--
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
El techo de mi cuarto lleno de universos
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list