Isn't it time

retard re at tard.com.invalid
Fri Jan 22 08:32:41 PST 2010


Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:28:20 +0100, Simen kjaeraas wrote:

> Anders F Björklund <afb at algonet.se> wrote:
> 
>> Steve Teale wrote:
>>> But where does the current discussion leave those of us who want to
>>> use D  and talk about the usage of what is the current mainstream core
>>> of the language - 1.055 - if I understand the situation correctly?
>>> That should be digitalmars.D.
>>
>> Probably D.oldskool or something. After all, it's now a decade old...
> 
> D 1.0 is 3 years old, not 10. The plan is not to have a group for D 0.1.

D 0.xxx and 0.xx were pretty close to D 1.0. 1.055 probably differs from 
1.00 almost as much as 0.99 did. Only a small amount of features were 
added and bugs fixed.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list