Can someone explain why this is not an error?

Adam Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Thu Jul 1 10:02:40 PDT 2010


On 7/1/10, Adam Ruppe <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote:
> (and auto, which is inferred from the missing type).

Nitpicking myself, but I shouldn't have said that; auto is just the
default storage class, and it is the missing type that means infer it,
not the auto keyword. I think you know what I mean though.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list