Network I/O and streaming in D2
Johannes Pfau
spam at example.com
Fri Jul 2 08:22:07 PDT 2010
On 02.07.2010 09:07, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On 6/30/10 10:28 AM, "Adam Ruppe" <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For servers, they are still pretty useful. You can use the select()
>> call on unix to wait for any one of a set of connections to be ready
>> for you, and when it is, you then call the same blocking read/write
>> functions. Since you know ahead of time that they are ready, it
>> doesn't actually wait.
>
> Select has been out of favor for quite a while in favor of poll, epoll,
> kqueues, IO Completion ports, and the like. I'd recommend starting with
> libevent2 (http://monkey.org/~provos/libevent/) if the license fits, and
> fire events through the D concurrency mechanisms.
>
> Layering blocking APIs on top of this should be pretty easy.
>
Just wondering, as libevent was already brought up on the newsgroup some
time ago, is there a special reason to use libevent instead of libev?
Both seem to be actively developed and liberally licensed (libevent: 3
Clause BSD libev: 2 Clause BSD), but at least for libevent1 libev claims
to be faster. Some new benchmarks against libevent2 (
http://lists.schmorp.de/pipermail/libev/2010q2/001033.html ) show no big
difference in speed anymore (libev is still faster when using timeouts
or many clients). So any special reason to use one rather than the other?
--
Johannes Pfau
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list