Overhauling the notion of output range
BLS
windevguy at hotmail.de
Mon Jul 12 13:45:39 PDT 2010
On 12/07/2010 03:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> he notion of output range has been a tad vague in the past; up until now
> a range that wanted to qualify as an output range had to define a method
> called put.
What if we have to deal with non orthogonal structures, or .. simple
directed graphs ?
well well.. yet we do not even have a simple map!(string , T) in
std.container .. So, For me the Range Stuff still lacks proof of
product. I remain pretty sceptical.
bjoern
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list