Axiomatic purity of D

[lurker]

Justin Johansson Wrote:

> To what degree do the author and advocates of the D(2) Programming
> Language believe that it is axiomatically pure and to what degree
> to the naysayers believe that it is conversely impure.  Further,
> does axiomatic purity in a PL really matter?
> 
> Thanks in advance for all opinions offered.

What *is* axiomatic purity? A quick google books search returned titles like:

"Jesus remembered"
"American physics in transition: a history of conceptual change in"
"Feminism-art-theory: an anthology, 1968-2000"
"Feminism and tradition in aesthetics"
"Constructive interventions: paradigms, process and practice of .."
"Agriculture and rural connections in the Pacific, 1500-1900"
"Possessed by the past: the heritage crusade and the spoils of history"