Signed word lengths and indexes
Kagamin
spam at here.lot
Tue Jun 15 07:38:50 PDT 2010
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:48:10 -0400, BCS <none at anon.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Steven,
> >
> >> div0 <div0 at users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> >>
> >>> for(uint i = end - 1; i < length; --i)
> >>> ...
> >> What does "length" represent here? It's not clear to me how "i"
> >> descending toward zero is going to break the guard condition.
> >>
> >
> > My thought exactly.
> >
> > If i<j and you --i, I'd assume i<j, if your code depends on the case
> > where the assumption is wrong, don't ask me to do a code review because
> > I won't sign off on it.
> >
>
> i is unsigned, and therefore can never be less than 0. It's actually a
> clever way to do it that I've never thought of.
>
> Read it more like this:
>
> for(uint i = end - 1; i < length && i >= 0; --i)
>
> But the i >= 0 is implicit because i is unsigned.
>
foreach_reverse, lol
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list