enforce()?

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:31:39 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> Michel Fortin wrote:
>> On 2010-06-16 05:15:24 -0400, Walter Bright
>> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> said:
>> 
>>> The difference is not based on those 3 points, but on what Andrei
>>> wrote here. Contracts and error checking are completely distinct
>>> activities and should not be conflated.
>> 
>> True.
>> 
>> Yet, enforce is inside std.contracts. If that isn't conflating the two
>> concepts I wonder what it is. :-)
> 
> You're right! I think Lars' suggestion is sensible - we should move
> enforce to object. Better yet we should find a better name for
> std.contracts. Ideas?
> 
> Andrei


A few suggestions (even though I still think it belongs in object.d), in 
no particular order:

std.enforce
std.assumptions
std.constraints
std.checks
std.tests
std.error
std.errcheck

-Lars