Signed word lengths and indexes

BCS none at anon.com
Fri Jun 18 21:11:16 PDT 2010


Hello Don,

> It's C's cavalier approach to implicit conversions that wrecks generic
> code. And it makes such a pigs breakfast of it that >>> doesn't quite
> work.
> 

I still haven't seen anyone address how typeof(a>>>b) == typeof(a) breaks 
c code when a>>>b isn't legal c to begin with. (Note, I'm not saying do the 
same with >> or << because I see why that can;t be done)

-- 
... <IXOYE><





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list