Signed word lengths and indexes
BCS
none at anon.com
Fri Jun 18 21:11:16 PDT 2010
Hello Don,
> It's C's cavalier approach to implicit conversions that wrecks generic
> code. And it makes such a pigs breakfast of it that >>> doesn't quite
> work.
>
I still haven't seen anyone address how typeof(a>>>b) == typeof(a) breaks
c code when a>>>b isn't legal c to begin with. (Note, I'm not saying do the
same with >> or << because I see why that can;t be done)
--
... <IXOYE><
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list