Is there ANY chance we can fix the bitwise operator precedence rules?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 06/18/2010 10:08 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:22:47 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>
>> Walter had no retort to that argument, so he veered into a critique of
>> the goto case XXX solution saying it's unmaintainable: when you moving
>> code around you want to keep on falling through but with goto you'd
>> need to update the goto target. However, it can be argued that
>> logically you want to continue processing at some specific logical
>> point, not to blindly fall through to whatever the heck code happens
>> to be there.
>
> Well, if "goto case XXX" is unmaintainable, how about some combination
> of existing keywords? For example, "continue switch;".
>
> -- Best regards,
> Vladimir mailto:vladimir at thecybershadow.net

Clever!

Andrei