Is there ANY chance we can fix the bitwise operator precedence

[KennyTM~]

On Jun 19, 10 17:56, bearophile wrote:
> KennyTM~:
>> This "fallthrough" statement already exists.
>>
>>       switch (x) {
>>          case 0:
>>            do_something();
>>            goto case;
>>          case 1:
>>            do_more_thing();
>>            goto case;
>>          case 2:
>>            done();
>>            break;
>>          default:
>>            error();
>>            break;
>>       }
>
> I didn't know this, this is a hidden D feature. So it's just a matter of D forbidding the cases that miss an explicit return, goto, or break, assert(0), exit(), and similar.
>
> As for the multiple returns in a function this needs a bit of care because this is acceptable:
>
> switch (x) {
>      case 0:
>          if (y)
>              goto case;
>          else
>              return x;
>      default:
>          break;
> }
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Actually it's not hidden :)

    http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/statement.html#GotoStatement
    http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html#GotoStatement