Is there ANY chance we can fix the bitwise operator precedence rules?

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:27:32 -0700, Bill Baxter wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Leandro Lucarella <luca at llucax.com.ar>
> wrote:
>> Bill Baxter, el 21 de junio a las 17:13 me escribiste:
>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Leandro Lucarella
>>> <luca at llucax.com.ar> wrote:
>>> > goto next case; is a little more verbose but very clear to me :)
>>> >
>>> > Maybe just next case; is a shorter alternative...
>>>
>>> That would be great if "next" were a D keyword.  But I don't think
>>> you're going to get Walter to add a keyword just for this.
>>
>> Damn! Where did I get next from? I don't know...
> 
> I think it's a keyword in Perl maybe?
> 
> --bb

It is a keyword in BASIC, at least. :)

  FOR i = 1 TO 100
    PRINT i
  NEXT

-Lars