[TDPL] arrays of D future

[Lutger]

Simen kjaeraas wrote:

> Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Andrei,
>>>
>>> I must say that the reading is absolutely enjoyable. I do have one
>>> question regarding the StackImpl example on page 234. Are you
>>> forecasting
>>> future functionality that arrays will support with your use of .empty,
>>> .back,
>>> and .popBack or am I too na�ve to understand that I need to implement
>>> this
>>> functionality in order for your example to compile?
>>
>> These functions are implemented in std.array, you only need to import
>> that
>> module.
> 
> Now why aren't those included by default? Sure, they're not always
> necessary, but they are what makes arrays into ranges, a property that
> has touted extensively.
> 

A public import of std.array by std.algorithm could do the trick.