Renaming std.conv

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday 27 June 2010 16:09:02 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> 
> We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any
> other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.
> 
> Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
> exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain
> file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?
> 
> 
> Andrei

std.exception sounds like a good plan. I'm not overly fond of any of the other 
names, and I'm not sure that I care much one way or the other if we pick one, 
but std.exception with a bunch of exception-related stuff sounds particularly 
useful and could help standardize some of the way exceptions are used in D code.

- Jonathan M Davis